
As the owner of an IT services or Digital marketing firm contemplating the sale of your business, you’ve likely encountered the terms EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) and SDE (Seller’s Discretionary Earnings). While both metrics are used to evaluate business value, understanding their differences and implications is critical to navigating the Mergers & Acquisitions process.
The Role of SDE in Business Valuation
Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE) is a business valuation metric that includes the seller’s compensation in addition to EBITDA. Many owners of middle-market businesses draw salaries (sometimes higher than market) or take other personal benefits from the company, which may not reflect the business’s earning potential under new ownership. SDE normalizes these owner-specific expenses to provide a clearer picture of the cash flow available to a prospective buyer.
For businesses with revenue under $5 million, SDE can be a useful tool in preliminary valuation discussions. It helps highlight the true discretionary cash flow a new owner might expect. However, SDE has its limitations, especially as transactions move into the middle market ($10M+ revenue) or involve institutional buyers and lenders.
Why EBITDA Matters More in the Middle Market
EBITDA differs from SDE by excluding the seller’s personal compensation and focuses solely on the operational performance of the business. This distinction becomes crucial when presenting your company to more seasoned buyers, private equity groups, or lenders, who rely heavily on EBITDA to assess the company’s ability to generate sustainable cash flow post-sale.
Consider this scenario: During initial discussions, your firm’s value is based on SDE. Later, a Quality of Earnings (QoE) analysis recalculates the valuation using normalized adjusted EBITDA, adjusting for market-based compensation for a replacement CEO or other key roles. This recalibration often results in a lower valuation than anticipated, leading to renegotiations or even deal fallout. In many cases, owners then scream "who moved my cheese?"
To avoid such pitfalls, it’s essential to understand and articulate how your business’s financials translate from SDE to adjusted EBITDA, and ensure alignment with buyer expectations early in the process.
Key Considerations
Clarity in Valuation Metrics: Always establish whether your valuation is based on SDE or EBITDA. This should be clearly documented in the Letter of Intent (LOI) to minimize misunderstandings during due diligence.
Know Your Audience: Buyers and lenders prioritize EBITDA because it reflects the business’s operational performance after all necessary expenses—including market-rate compensation for owners and key employees—are accounted for.
Plan for Transition: If your compensation or other discretionary expenses are above market norms, expect adjustments during the QoE process. Being transparent about these adjustments can build trust with buyers and streamline negotiations.
Focus on Sustainability: Buyers want to see that your firm’s profitability is sustainable and scalable. Demonstrating normalized EBITDA ensures you’re presenting a realistic and attractive financial picture.
Document Operational Processes: Ensure your business operations are well-documented and standardized. Buyers value businesses with clear, replicable processes that don’t rely too heavily on the current owner. This reduces perceived risk and increases confidence in a smooth post-sale transition.
Summary
Selling your IT services firm or digital marketing agency is a significant milestone, and understanding the financial metrics driving valuation is key to achieving your goals. While SDE can serve as a helpful starting point, shifting the focus to EBITDA ensures your business stands out to serious buyers and financing sources.
By addressing these factors early and working closely with trusted advisors, you’ll be better equipped to manage the complexities of the M&A process and secure a transaction that reflects the true value of your business.
Comments